<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Conventional Geek</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.conventionalgeek.com/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.conventionalgeek.com</link>
	<description>Musings of a self-confessed Nerd</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2012 12:37:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>How an AT&amp;T Smartphone Comes to Life</title>
		<link>http://www.conventionalgeek.com/2012/01/30/how-an-att-smartphone-comes-to-life/</link>
		<comments>http://www.conventionalgeek.com/2012/01/30/how-an-att-smartphone-comes-to-life/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2012 12:37:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>richard</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[phones]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.conventionalgeek.com/?p=66</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Great look at the silliness of smartphone design: http://www.engadget.com/2011/11/15/how-an-atandt-smartphone-comes-to-life-behind-the-scenes-part-on/]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great look at the silliness of smartphone design:</p>
<p>http://www.engadget.com/2011/11/15/how-an-atandt-smartphone-comes-to-life-behind-the-scenes-part-on/</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.conventionalgeek.com/2012/01/30/how-an-att-smartphone-comes-to-life/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why We Program</title>
		<link>http://www.conventionalgeek.com/2012/01/12/why-we-program/</link>
		<comments>http://www.conventionalgeek.com/2012/01/12/why-we-program/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jan 2012 22:05:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>richard</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[programming]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.conventionalgeek.com/?p=63</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I love Marco Arment&#8217;s comment answering the question &#8220;Why did you write this software?&#8221; after stating clearly it isn&#8217;t a unique solution. marcoarment/secondcrack &#8211; GitHub: Because I&#8217;m a programmer, and this is what I do. Some people jog away from their house every day, only to jog back. Others walk on a treadmill, expending energy [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I love Marco Arment&#8217;s comment answering the question &#8220;Why did you write this software?&#8221; after stating clearly it isn&#8217;t a unique solution.</p>
<p><a href="https://github.com/marcoarment/secondcrack">marcoarment/secondcrack &#8211; GitHub</a>:</p>
<blockquote>
<p>Because I&#8217;m a programmer, and this is what I do.</p>
<p>Some people jog away from their house every day, only to jog back. Others walk on a treadmill, expending energy to get nowhere. In both cases, it may appear to others that they&#8217;ve accomplished nothing, but they&#8217;ve chosen to do these seemingly redundant activities on a regular basis to incrementally improve themselves. And it works.</p>
</blockquote>
<p> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.conventionalgeek.com/2012/01/12/why-we-program/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Codemash 2.0.1.2</title>
		<link>http://www.conventionalgeek.com/2012/01/12/codemash-2-0-1-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.conventionalgeek.com/2012/01/12/codemash-2-0-1-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jan 2012 15:44:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>richard</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Conventions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[programming]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.conventionalgeek.com/?p=60</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Spending the next couple of days as Codemash 2.0.1.2.  There&#8217;s a reason why the conference sold out in 20 minutes.  Good speakers, good community, and it takes place at a water park.  Hard to fail with that combination.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Spending the next couple of days as <a href="http://www.codemash.org">Codemash 2.0.1.2</a>.  There&#8217;s a reason why the conference sold out in 20 minutes.  Good speakers, good community, and it takes place at a water park.  Hard to fail with that combination.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.conventionalgeek.com/2012/01/12/codemash-2-0-1-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Codemash 2012 Around the Corner!</title>
		<link>http://www.conventionalgeek.com/2012/01/03/codemash-2012-around-the-corner/</link>
		<comments>http://www.conventionalgeek.com/2012/01/03/codemash-2012-around-the-corner/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jan 2012 07:27:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>richard</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Conventions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[programming]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.conventionalgeek.com/?p=57</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Wow, it&#8217;s almost here! Codemash (www.codemash.org) is one of the best programming conferences in the area.  It&#8217;s also one of the most popular, selling out in 20 minutes this year.  Not even WWDC did that!  It might have something to do with the fact that the conference is held at a huge water park.  I [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow, it&#8217;s almost here! Codemash (www.codemash.org) is one of the best programming conferences in the area.  It&#8217;s also one of the most popular, selling out in 20 minutes this year.  Not even WWDC did that!  It might have something to do with the fact that the conference is held at a huge water park.  I know my family is coming; they&#8217;ll spend the day at the park while I&#8217;m in session and we&#8217;ll do things together in the evening.</p>
<p>The conference is fairly unique in this area since it isn&#8217;t bound to a particular platform.  Ruby on Rails, .NET, iOS, they&#8217;re all well represented during the course of the week.  Since I enjoy all of those things I always have a great time.</p>
<p>I thought about doing a session this year, but the timing just wasn&#8217;t right.  I&#8217;ll make a submission next year for sure.  It&#8217;s one of those kinds of participatory conferences.  At 750 people it&#8217;s the biggest thing going in this area since Microsoft abandoned us a few years ago.</p>
<p>So January 11-13 I may be a bit slow to respond&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.conventionalgeek.com/2012/01/03/codemash-2012-around-the-corner/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>.NET Skillset Sunset?</title>
		<link>http://www.conventionalgeek.com/2012/01/03/net-skillset-sunset/</link>
		<comments>http://www.conventionalgeek.com/2012/01/03/net-skillset-sunset/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jan 2012 01:11:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>richard</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[.NET Technologies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[programming]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.conventionalgeek.com/?p=54</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There&#8217;s been a lot of troubling events in the world of .NET.  It seems Microsoft has changed course (again) and is promoting HTML 5 over it&#8217;s own proprietary technologies, such as Silverlight.  The uproar is that many developers have invested their careers into technologies that seem to be almost overnight no longer mainstream. As Wikipedia [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There&#8217;s been a lot of troubling events in the world of .NET.  It seems Microsoft has changed course (again) and is promoting HTML 5 over it&#8217;s own proprietary technologies, such as Silverlight.  The uproar is that many developers have invested their careers into technologies that seem to be almost overnight no longer mainstream.</p>
<p>As <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/.NET_Framework">Wikipedia says</a>:</p>
<blockquote>
<p>&#8220;The explicit disavowal of Flash seems also to signal that Microsoft does not intend .net framework websites to take over all interaction with the user. This aspect of .NET would seem at least to be obsolete.&#8221;</p>
</blockquote>
<p>While I can&#8217;t argue that Microsoft is making a bad choice to support standards-based HTML 5 over its own Silverlight or Adobe&#8217;s Flash it does make a cautionary tale about investing too heavily into any one platform or technology.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve always tried to &#8220;broaden my horizons&#8221; when it comes to programming.  Even when I was a heads-down Microsoft WPF developer I spent the time and effort to develop iOS apps and learn Ruby on Rails (both are SO much more enjoyable to work with by the way).  It&#8217;s this diversity that has always helped my career advance.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.conventionalgeek.com/2012/01/03/net-skillset-sunset/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>My New Ride</title>
		<link>http://www.conventionalgeek.com/2011/12/30/my-new-ride/</link>
		<comments>http://www.conventionalgeek.com/2011/12/30/my-new-ride/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Dec 2011 01:13:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>richard</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.conventionalgeek.com/?p=46</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Speaking of the car, here&#8217;s a picture of my new 2012 Ford Shelby GT500 Convertible!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img title="new_shelby.jpg" src="http://www.conventionalgeek.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/12/new_shelby.jpg" border="0" alt="Shelby" width="600" height="450" /></p>
<p>Speaking of the car, here&#8217;s a picture of my new 2012 Ford Shelby GT500 Convertible!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.conventionalgeek.com/2011/12/30/my-new-ride/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Officially Winter</title>
		<link>http://www.conventionalgeek.com/2011/12/30/officially-winter/</link>
		<comments>http://www.conventionalgeek.com/2011/12/30/officially-winter/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Dec 2011 01:05:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>richard</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Automotive]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.conventionalgeek.com/?p=42</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It&#8217;s officially winter… the baby is put to bed for her long sleep.  Can&#8217;t wait until spring!  ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img title="IMG_1585.jpg" src="http://www.conventionalgeek.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/12/IMG_15851.jpg" border="0" alt="IMG 1585" width="600" height="450" /></p>
<p>It&#8217;s officially winter… the baby is put to bed for her long sleep.  Can&#8217;t wait until spring!</p>
<p> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.conventionalgeek.com/2011/12/30/officially-winter/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>1930 Packard at Hershey</title>
		<link>http://www.conventionalgeek.com/2011/10/06/1930-packard-at-hershey/</link>
		<comments>http://www.conventionalgeek.com/2011/10/06/1930-packard-at-hershey/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Oct 2011 19:41:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>richard</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.conventionalgeek.com/2011/10/06/1930-packard-at-hershey/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Beautiful cars here at the Hershey Meet. This 1930 Packard is listed for $165,000. It looks mint. Restored and with a recent fresh paint job.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.conventionalgeek.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/20111006-154048.jpg"><img src="http://www.conventionalgeek.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/20111006-154048.jpg" alt="20111006-154048.jpg" class="alignnone size-full" /></a></p>
<p>Beautiful cars here at the Hershey Meet. This 1930 Packard is listed for $165,000. It looks mint. Restored and with a recent fresh paint job.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.conventionalgeek.com/2011/10/06/1930-packard-at-hershey/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why an iPhone 4S is Anything but Disappointing</title>
		<link>http://www.conventionalgeek.com/2011/10/03/why-an-iphone-4s-is-anything-but-disappointing/</link>
		<comments>http://www.conventionalgeek.com/2011/10/03/why-an-iphone-4s-is-anything-but-disappointing/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Oct 2011 14:03:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>richard</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Apple Gear]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iphone]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.conventionalgeek.com/?p=37</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Smartest thing I&#8217;ve read on tomorrow release today.  Makes me think we&#8217;ll only see one phone and that phone will look remarkably like the iPhone 4. Why an iPhone 4S is Anything but Disappointing [Opinion] &#124; Cult of Mac: &#8220;You’re probably snickering at this ridiculous idea that a unique design completely trumps functionality. I don’t [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Smartest thing I&#8217;ve read on tomorrow release today.  Makes me think we&#8217;ll only see one phone and that phone will look remarkably like the iPhone 4.</p>
<blockquote>
<p><a href="http://www.cultofmac.com/119960/why-the-iphone-4s-is-anything-but-disappointing-opinion/">Why an iPhone 4S is Anything but Disappointing [Opinion] | Cult of Mac</a>: &#8220;You’re probably snickering at this ridiculous idea that a unique design completely trumps functionality. I don’t blame you. However, a lot of Apple fans are falling into the trap of this same ideology that claims the looks of the new iPhone are more important than the functionality it will bring with it.&#8221;</p>
</blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.conventionalgeek.com/2011/10/03/why-an-iphone-4s-is-anything-but-disappointing/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Microsoft admits improper Windows Phone location tracking</title>
		<link>http://www.conventionalgeek.com/2011/09/29/microsoft-admits-improper-windows-phone-location-tracking/</link>
		<comments>http://www.conventionalgeek.com/2011/09/29/microsoft-admits-improper-windows-phone-location-tracking/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Sep 2011 02:34:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>richard</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Apple Gear]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.conventionalgeek.com/?p=32</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Heh, why do people single out Apple when this kind of stuff happens? Now let&#8217;s see what kind of press Microsoft gets: Microsoft admits improper Windows Phone location tracking: Microsoft has quietly acknowledged a privacy problem with its Windows Phone 7 software, following a number of critical reports. The company posted information on its privacy [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Heh, why do people single out Apple when this kind of stuff happens? Now let&#8217;s see what kind of press Microsoft gets:</p>
<p><a href="http://feeds.electronista.com/click.phdo?i=092044dfd673f73f6c8056d72b878f77">Microsoft admits improper Windows Phone location tracking</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p><img style="border-style: initial; border-color: initial; border-width: 0px; margin: 5px;" src="http://photos.macnn.com/news/1108/fujitsuis12t.jpg" alt="" width="176" height="120" align="left" border="0" />Microsoft has quietly acknowledged a privacy problem with its Windows Phone 7 software, following a number of critical reports. The company posted information on its privacy pages admitting that its mobile OS exhibits &#8220;unintended behavior&#8221; by sending location information, such as details of nearby Wi-Fi access points and cell towers, even when a user declines to share such data&#8230;.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p></blockquote>
<p>(Via <a href="http://www.Electronista.com/">Electronista | Gadgets for Geeks</a>)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.conventionalgeek.com/2011/09/29/microsoft-admits-improper-windows-phone-location-tracking/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

